Comparison
Bikma and Peec AI are two European platforms that monitor how generative models talk about a brand, but with a different approach: Bikma pairs the platform with a university-validated method and an analyst-backed service; Peec AI is a very broad self-serve platform, with fast adoption and transparent pricing.
Choose Peec AI if you want a broad self-serve platform, many models on your own and a quick start. Choose Bikma if you want a university-validated method, five analysis dimensions including Fact Checking and an analyst-backed service in support.
Peec AI is a European self-serve platform, based in Berlin, with unlimited seats. It offers broad self-serve coverage (ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini and Naver, with other models via API on the higher plans) and a rich feature set: prompt, topic and competitor suggestions, AI Shopping, source and citation analysis, Brand Perception with fact-checking and agentic actions. For agencies it provides unlimited workspaces, white-label dashboards and automated reporting, with data access via API, MCP, Looker Studio and CSV export.
Bikma covers five dimensions (Question Analysis, Share of Voice, External Sources, Sentiment and Fact Checking) and weights prompts with a Prompt Probability Index born of research with the University of Pisa and the University of Insubria. On the Corporate plan it pairs the data with a service that includes a monthly report reviewed by a senior analyst. Data stays in the EU and prompts are asked in the native language. For agencies it offers isolated workspaces, pitches and white-label from the Teams plan. Data comes out via MCP on the Scout and Teams agency plans and via API on the Corporate plan.
| Bikma | Peec AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Platform plus managed service | Self-serve SaaS |
| Prompt method | Literature and Prompt Probability Index, validated with two universities | Prompt suggestions, prompt volume |
| Model coverage | 2 to 4 on the directly activated plans (ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini); all of them, including Perplexity, Copilot, Claude and Grok, on Corporate | Six models self-serve, others via API on the higher plans |
| Analysis dimensions | Five, including External Sources, Sentiment and Fact Checking (Fact Checking on the Corporate plan) | Visibility, position, sentiment, SoV, citation share, Brand Perception |
| Data and language | Data in the EU, native-language prompts | European (Berlin) |
| Agencies | Isolated workspaces, pitches, white-label from the Teams plan | Unlimited workspaces, pitches, white-label, automated reporting |
| Data access | MCP on the Scout and Teams plans, API on Corporate | API, MCP, Looker Studio, CSV |
| Price (agencies) | Brands: Starter €49, Basic €199 a month billed annually (€59 and €249 monthly). Agencies: Scout €169, Teams €429 (€199 and €499 monthly). Corporate and Partner tailored | Credit-based plans |
| Trial | 7 days | 7 days |
These are two good European platforms with several overlaps. Peec AI suits those who want self-serve breadth, many models on their own and a quick start. Bikma suits those who value the validated method, Fact Checking and an analyst-led process, with EU data.
Yes. Peec AI is based in Berlin; Bikma is a European platform with EU data and native-language prompts. The difference lies in the model: broad self-serve on one side, platform plus analyst-backed service on the other.
Yes. On the Scout and Teams agency plans Bikma's data comes out via MCP, and the Corporate plan includes the API. Peec AI offers API, MCP and a Looker Studio connector.
On the Corporate plan, a monthly report reviewed by a senior analyst: beyond the data, the interpretation and the action plan. It is Fortop's consulting component alongside the platform.